<< Back to Homepage PART TIME GREEN - How does meat consumption affect the environment?
How does meat consumption affect the environment?
The Food Revolution, a must read
Posted by Staff on March 03, 2009 12:16 pm
Conventionally farmed meat is one of the worst things for the environment. A kilogram of beef is responsible for more greenhouse gas emissions and
other pollution than driving for 3 hours while leaving all the lights
on back home, says theAkifumi Ogino of the National Institute of Livestock and Grassland Science. The energy required
to feed, raise, butcher, transport and generally make meat edible is pretty substantial amount.
Also, livestock farmers in some places are
deforesting areas to get more grazing land.
The following information is taken from The Food Revolution.
Waste, Water, and Rainforests
In traditional farming, the animals ate grass, crop wastes, and
kitchen scraps that people could not eat, and turned them into food
that people could eat.Their manure provided the soil
with needed nutrients as a natural and biodegradable fertilizer, and it
was a cycle that sustained the environment, the animals, and the people.
With the expansion and mechanization of animal farming, world meat production has quadrupled in the last 50 years.—"Taking Stock: Animal Farming and the Environment"
There are now 20 billion livestock on Earth—more than triple the number of human beings. —World Watch Paper
In years past, most of the manure from livestock returned to enrich the soil.But
today, when huge numbers of animals are concentrated in feedlots and
confinement buildings, there is no economically feasible way to return
the animals' wastes to the land.
Deprived of the manure and continually doused with chemicals, our
nation's soils are losing their texture and ability to retain topsoil,
the rich layer without which food production becomes seriously
endangered.
The production of every quarter pound hamburger in the US causes the loss of five times the burger's weight in topsoil.—Stuff: The Secret Lives of Everyday Things
In the U.S., livestock now produces 130 times as much waste as people do. —"Will We Still Eat Meat?" Time Magazine
We have strict laws governing the disposal of human waste, but the
regulars are lax, or often nonexistent for animal waste. —Union of
Concerned Scientists
Instead of being returned to the soil and helping to rebuild
topsoil, the waste form today's livestock often end up in our water.
Water required to produce 1 pound of U.S. beef, according to the
National Cattlemen's Beef Association: 441 gallons —"Myths and Facts
about Beef Production: Water Use" National Cattlemen's Beef Association
Water required to produce 1 pound of U.S. beef , according to Dr.
Georg Borgstrom, Chairman of the Food, Science and Human Nutrition
Department of the College of Agriculture and Natural Resources at
Michigan State University: 2,500 gallons — "Impacts on Demand for and
Quality of Land and Water"
Water required to produce 1 pound of California beef, according to
the Water Education Foundation: 2,464 gallons —"Water Inputs in
California Food Production"
Water required to produce 1 pound of California beef , according to
the Soil and Water specialists, University of California Agricultural
Extension, working with livestock farm advisors: 5,214 gallons —Soil and Water
In California today, you save more water by not eating a pound of
beef than you would by not showering 6 months to a year (depending on
which figure you want to use).
In Central America, cattle typically graze on land that was rainforest before being cut down and burned to be use fro rangeland.According
to the Rainforest Action Network, 55 square feet of tropical
rainforest, an area the size of a small kitchen, is destroyed for the
production of every fast food hamburger made from rainforest beef. —People of the Tropical Rainforest
In both 1993 and 1994, the U.S. imported over 200,000,000 pounds of fresh and frozen beef from Central American countries.Two
thirds of these countries' rainforests have been cleared, primarily to
raise cattle whose cheap meat is exported the U.S. food industry.When
it enters the U.S., the beef is not labeled with its country of origin,
so there is no way to trace it to its sources. —"Seven Things You Can
Do to Save the Rainforest" Rainforest Action Network
Imports of beef by the U.S. from southern Mexico and Central
America during the past 25 years has been the major factor in the loss
of about half of the tropical forests there—all for the sake of keeping
the price of hamburger in the U.S. about a nickel less than it would
have been otherwise. —We're Killing Our World: The Global Ecosystem in Crisis MacArthur Foundation Report
Here are a few suggestions:
-Avoid fast food meat .
-If you eat meat, try and make it local/organic.
(or at least cut down on amount)
With this swine flu thing going on, isn't time that we ban mega pig farming? Do we know what all that concentration of waste is doing to the environment and the water table? Experts have been warning of the consequences of allowing corporate greed to override public health and safety. Or do we prefer to face a deadly pandemic. So far, this time we seem to have dodged the bullet. What about next time? Enough already!!!
March 05, 2009 3:10 pm
Posted by JulieAnn W.
Best and easiest way to reduce your impact on the environment is to eat less meat. This is one of the most frightening articles I've ever read. Makes me sick.